I currently have Fedora 10 and I installed VLC media player. When ever I open it to play a song it gives me 2 errors and the song sounds real choppy. These are the errors I get. . . How do I fix them?
Summary:
SELinux is preventing vlc from loading /usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1 which
requires text relocation.
Detailed Description:
The vlc application attempted to load /usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1 which
requires text relocation. This is a potential security problem. Most libraries
do not need this permission. Libraries are sometimes coded incorrectly and
request this permission. The SELinux Memory Protection Tests
(http://people. redhat. com/drepper/selinux-mem. html) web page explains how to
remove this requirement. You can configure SELinux temporarily to allow
/usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1 to use relocation as a workaround, until the
library is fixed. Please file a bug report
(http://bugzilla. redhat. com/bugzilla/enter_bug. cgi) against this package.
Allowing Access:
If you trust /usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1 to run correctly, you can change
the file context to textrel_shlib_t. “chcon -t textrel_shlib_t
‘/usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1′” You must also change the default file
context files on the system in order to preserve them even on a full relabel.
“semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t ‘/usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1′”
Fix Command:
chcon -t textrel_shlib_t ‘/usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1′
Additional Information:
Source Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_exe…
Target Context system_u:object_r:lib_t:s0
Target Objects /usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1 [ file ]
Source vlc
Source Path /usr/bin/vlc
Port
Host Andrew. Altizer
Source RPM Packages vlc-core-0. 9. 8a-1. fc10
Target RPM Packages ffmpeg-libs-0. 4. 9-0. 52. 20080908. fc10
Policy RPM selinux-policy-3. 5. 13-18. fc10
Selinux Enabled True
Policy Type targeted
MLS Enabled True
Enforcing Mode Enforcing
Plugin Name allow_execmod
Host Name Andrew. Altizer
Platform Linux Andrew. Altizer 2. 6. 27. 5-117. fc10. i686 #1 SMP
Tue Nov 18 12:19:59 EST 2008 i686 athlon
Alert Count 4
First Seen Mon 05 Jan 2009 01:43:28 PM AST
Last Seen Mon 05 Jan 2009 01:56:42 PM AST
Local ID 143b1d8e-4c8f-4189-a377-d97326d786c4
Line Numbers
Raw Audit Messages
node=Andrew. Altizer type=AVC msg=audit(1231153002. 320:27): avc: denied { execmod } for pid=3452 comm=”vlc” path=”/usr/lib/sse2/libswscale. so. 0. 6. 1″ dev=dm-0 ino=2551557 scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:uncon… tcontext=system_u:object_r:lib_t:s0 tclass=file
node=Andrew. Altizer type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1231153002. 320:27): arch=40000003 syscall=125 success=no exit=-13 a0=21c000 a1=2c000 a2=5 a3=bfb3d1e0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=3452 auid=500 uid=500 gid=500 euid=500 suid=500 fsuid=500 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=1 comm=”vlc” exe=”/usr/bin/vlc” subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfine… key=(null)
and. . . . . .
Summary:
SELinux is preventing vlc from loading /usr/lib/sse2/libpostproc. so. 51. 2. 0 which
requires text relocation.
Detailed Description:
The vlc application attempted to load /usr/lib/sse2/libpostproc. so. 51. 2. 0 which
requires text relocation. This is a potential security problem. Most libraries
do not need this permission. Libraries are sometimes coded incorrectly and
request this permission. The SELinux Memory Protection Tests
(http://people. redhat. com/drepper/selinux-mem. html) web page explains how to
remove this requirement. You can configure SELinux temporarily to allow
/usr/lib/sse2/libpostproc. so. 51. 2. 0 to use relocation as a workaround, until the
library is fixed. Please file a bug report
(http://bugzilla. redhat. com/bugzilla/enter_bug. cgi) against this package.
Allowing Access:
If you trust /usr/lib/sse2/libpostproc. so. 51. 2. 0 to run correctly, you can
change the file context to textrel_shlib_t. “chcon -t textrel_shlib_t
‘/usr/lib/sse2/libpostproc. so. 51. 2. 0′” You must also change the default file
context files on the system in order to preserve them even on a full relabel.
“semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t ‘/usr/lib/sse2/libpostproc. so. 51. 2. 0′”
Fix Command:
chcon -t textrel_shlib_t ‘/usr/lib/sse2/libpostproc. so. 51. 2. 0′
Additional Information:
Source Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_exe…
Target Context system_u:object_r:lib_t:s0
Target Objects /usr/lib/sse2/libpostp
Posts Tagged ‘Linux’
What’s The Difference Between Linux Web Hosting And Windows Web Hosting. ?
Saturday, February 27th, 2010I just want to know what it means so I don’t waste my money on the wrong thing.
Webhosting: Windows Hosting Against Linux Hosting
Tuesday, December 1st, 2009Choosing an operating system (OS) that runs the web server hosting ones site is as old as the business of web hosting.
All the functions of web server and hosting a site are controlled by operating system, so one should pay particular attention while choosing operating system.
Options one really have while choosing an Os are:-
One can choose between webhosting based on Windows, Linux or UNIX operating systems. List of options will narrow to only two just if one has a brief description and analysis of the different systems.
Microsoft?s Windows server operating systems (NT/2000/2003) makes IT teams to easier in this aspect with its quite friendly and familiar user interface feature. Their range is absolutely impressive and its excellent integration capabilities with other applications developed by Microsoft gives another plus to its feature.
The beginning of the Internet era was powered by the OS UNIX and is still used today due to its qualities whereas Linux OS was developed having Unix as starting point and thus both share many features. Due to higher licensing costs and specific hardware requirements for UNIX, Linux version of the UNIX system is more common on web servers today. With taking UNIX into account this is the reason why we will continue with Linux only. Linux hosting fulfills all requirements for a good web server and Web serving, file serving, mailing, and streaming. It has also proven to be a very cost-effective choice from using hardware efficiently; it also allows more web sites per server ratio, which results in decreasing the cost of hosting per account.
Windows v/s Linux.
Trustworthiness
Linux OS were seen as more reliable over Windows during the past period. So here are our two choices Windows and Linux. But with the release of Windows 2003 server Microsoft has closed the gap in this area. Both Windows and Linux servers are compatible with definite Microsoft extensions and applications.
Web Programming
One might want to add up some simple scripts to add some spice to ones site even if one is trying to host a simple website. Matter becomes bigger when one is trying to host an e-commerce site supported by some serious server-side programming.
What do our two competitors do in this aspect?
As java scripts are executed on the client side (the user?s web browser) and both Linux and Windows have no problem feeding this content to ones visitors supporting java scripts is not a topic to be argued upon. Discussing server side scripting is a whole different matter. It is common perceptive that ASP is supported by Windows and PHP is the tool to do just that under Linux for web site owners trying to put into operation forms on their site. Even Though both OS have developed solutions to support each other?s programming language for web development this support is not ideal and the limitations propose Linux for a good PHP support and Windows for ASP, especially when it comes to hosting websites that require the full use of advantages offered by PHP or ASP.
Front Page extensions are supported by Linux. If Perl is the scripting language of ones choice, one should opt for Linux as Windows offers only limited CGI/Perl support.
Databases
Few databases are required for dynamically driven web sites. Often one will come across mySQL or MSAccess for sites employing databases. Web site has no problems while hosting it on either Windows or Linux if it is relying on mySQL, but for MSAccess databases, one has only option of Windows.
PriceWebhosting on Linux is cheaper. As the licensing costs, are lower than that for Windows and Linux has the ability of web servers to support a higher web site per server ratio without compromising the quality of service.
Even though hosting on Windows cost a bit more, one will get something for ones money i. e. quick development and functionality.
Choosing an OS one over another depends chiefly upon ones actual needs and of the plans one has made for the future of ones web site. For instance will it move from static web site to one relying heavily on server side scripting? And if it is so which programming language would be used: PHP or ASP? Accordingly ones web site will be placed on a Linux or on a Windows web server.
Option between Linux and Windows is offered by almost all serious web-hosting providers. No one is the actual winner as yet of this contest. Preference of one system over another is given only by ones requirements and the needs of the visitors.
Linux Hosting in Demand! Why?
Sunday, November 29th, 2009Web Hosting is today?s one of the prime requirements. Emerged from simple HTML pages hosting to a full blown web based hosted applications, creating several useful facilities for the people.
One can see Internet as a means of linking the business through out the world with the help of production of web based technologies like ASP, ASP. NET, JSP, PHP, etc. This choice has forced various options for web hosting now as HTML based sites work equally well on both Linux and Windows platforms.
Talking in fact, Web hosting platforms differs according to operating systems. If one talks about the most common and popular operating servers then the two names which come first in the mind are Microsoft Windows Server and Red hat Linux. As the names of most popular servers have already been disclosed, it leaves behind several questions to answer. Which includes merits and demerits of both the servers? What are the reasons of Linux to stay ahead? Etc.
Linux platform has been constructed by Community based efforts and with the assistance of several IT companies like Red Hat, Suse, and Mandrake it has been specially designed for professional application. Due to such a backup unit Linux Server is known for its strong, inexpensive and protected platform.
Today, quality and security matters without much effect on user?s pocket, which makes the Linux a good choice. In addition to ASP, ASP. NET, other web based technologies also efficiently run in Linux. No cost distribution of PHP, MySQL, and PERL has massively reduced the charges involved in hosting on a Linux Server.
When it comes to Linux hosting probability of virus attack, spamming and hacking are relatively few. Robust architecture and cost effective software?s play a very important role in this.
Given below are reasons why Linux based web server dominate over Windows:
Stability: very stable and provides uptime around 99. 9%.
Ownership cost: Linux operating servers comes without any charge or with simple charge. A fully fledge server with desk top applications. One will get stable server applications like FTP, Web Server, DNS Server, and File Server for free of cost.
Cooperative to User: one can easily host on Linux web servers. Both Linux and Windows have simple procedure when it comes to uploading and hosting.
When user?s requirement is to run tool like Front Page on a Linux based web server, he/she should confirm that the Front Page extensions are facilitated. This formality is necessary only when user is uploading using HTTP feature of Front Page. One should also ensure that if he/she chooses ?Front Page Extensions?; at the time of web site design, user should facilitate Front Page extensions to Linux web server. Nowadays, one can purchase Linux web servers with installable Front Page extensions, without any sort of problems. Generally, assisted file extensions include, . cgi, . html, . htm, . pl, . php, . shtml, . xml, etc.
Accessibility between hosts: A web site recommended for a Linux based web server can be hosted on a Windows web server easily, but its vice-versa may not be obtainable.
Scalability: one cannot overlook future expansion of the web site. It is dynamic and flourishes as per user?s necessities. One can consider that web design well-suited to a Linux/Unix based web server can match scalability requirements much easier as compare to others.
How Do You Design A Website That Is Compatible With Linux Web Hosting?
Monday, October 5th, 2009I don’t know anything about web design. What programs are compatable with Linux Web Hosting? What would you recommend? Do you know about any good templates compatable with Linux Web Hosting?
How to Install ffmpeg on Linux Hosting?
Friday, September 25th, 2009Hi,
Thank you for your time to read and helps me first
I have Linux web hosting with GoDaddy,
I want to install ffmpeg on my hosting
I have SSL or SSH or root access
Is there any way to install it
Please please help me out
Thanks for your help
What is the difference between Linux and Windows Web Hosting Web Hosting?
Friday, September 25th, 2009Heya Please tell em what's the difference between Linux and Windows web hosting and web hosting. I made my site from Dreamweaver does not affect any of the 2 should I do please tell me thanx!